Palin: Because We Don’t Need it

2008 September 7

One of my favorite bands in the world, Portugal. The Man, hails from a town in Alaska named Wasilla. I know this mostly from watching this video over and over again, hearing the name of the town constantly before the song starts:

So, imagine my surprise when all of a sudden John McCain chooses as his running mate a surprising shocker, governor of Alaska and former mayor of the mystery town of Wasilla. “Gee, I wonder what the guys from Portugal. the Man think of her?” was one of my first reactions.

Well, despite the very recent release of their newest (and possibly best) record, frontman John Gourley took the time to voice some opinions about the former mayor of his hometown. It is a perspective we don’t get to see much in the mainstream media, so definitely worth the read. I post the text of it here, but encourage you to visit their website and give a listen to their music, it is fantastic.

Palin, Because We Don’t Need It

Here is a story from the younger pages of John Gourley (going by Johnny at the time)…

My first hunting trip.


All through my smaller years, from a boy through to a man, I have known true Alaskans. People who hunted for a living. By “a living” I should be sure to mean “for survival” or “as a necessity… Something along those lines… It was just a part of life growing up here in Alaska. People hunt, people work, people live, and fish and sleep and work and work and work and so on.

One of my earliest memories is also one of the most influential lessons of life in my later years. My first hunting trip.

I must have been around 6 or 7 at the time and the setting is Alaskan winter at my childhood home in the small town of Knik. My parents were both dogsled mushers* and we lived in a house powered by generator alone. (*purely out of the adventure and experience. Not necessarily our main form of travel… though there were some points in my life where it became our most available source of transportation.) Our nearest neighbors were a couple of miles away, give or take. This, again, is not needed in this story but only here for you to understand the place in which the story is set… We happened to be sitting in our living room when, outside our massive picture windows, we spot a moose.  I will say, to a young boy, this animal was a giant. I can’t honestly tell you in any way how large it actually was, but to my eyes there was and will be nothing bigger. My family and I were sitting around watching it mill about minding its nature and peeling bark from the young birch trees. After a few moments my father turns to me “Hey Johnny, you want to go hunting? You want to go get a moose?” My mind went running. I had never been hunting before. EVERYONE I knew had been hunting and hunted. They had gone out with their fathers and now it was my turn. I nodded my little head and ran to throw on my snowsuit while my dad went to get his gun.

We walked outside in the cold and the snow, him in his bunny boots and winter coat and myself waddling out like a small scale Michelin man to meet our Moose and our dinner for the next few months. I remember the snow being very deep. Realistically, a foot of snow was deep to a small child. For effect and in the spirit of adventure and Alaskan winters I will say it must’ve been the wildest winter I can remember. Meter upon meter of snow. The naked birch trees blending with the white now, leaving little blotches of black and grey at the knots and branches. There was our moose. We had run right into its path. Right where we wanted to be. My father crouches down to my already shrunken size “Are you ready Johnny? Should we get it?” I again nod my head. My father raises the barrel and looks through the scope. We were less than 20 yards away, if that. He pulls his head away from the scope and looks to me again. “Are you sure? Do you want me to shoot it?” This time I am confused. In my mind I am thinking, “Of course I want you to shoot it! We are hunting! This is what we do, isn’t it? My friends have done it and I know you have as well! What are we waiting for?” But again, I nod. The nod was more out of fear of the moose hearing me. Normally I would have spoken my thoughts out loud. At the very least I would have questioned the hesitance. My dad looks through the barrel one last time. He turns off the safety and readies the rifle. He sights the moose and sits there for a moment. All the while I am looking from him to the moose then back to him then back to the moose. I hear the safety come back on and a turn back to see my father lowering the gun and resting it by his side. At this point I am about as confused as a small boy can be. Dad is looking at me and he says, “We’re not going to get it.” I ask him why. What he said has stuck with me throughout my entire life. “Because we don’t need it.” We simply stood up and walked back to the house, leaving the moose to its dinner of baby birch.

“Because we don’t need it.” Possibly the best lesson a man like this could have taught me. He moved up to Alaska in 1970, 2 years after he graduated. He lived in the deep woods in the mountains of Chase. He has run one of the most intense races in the world, The Iditarod, he worked as a potato farmer, lived off of 300$ for an entire year out in these woods… This man is as Alaskan as anyone I know. The lesson he handed to me was a respect of the world we live in. A respect for the animals we live with and the people we deal with. He has traveled around the state working in construction. Building homes for the people and buildings for companies and upon entering these small towns for work always insisted we hire within the community and support their way of life and living, despite what these companies felt to be the most economical. He has handed me so much, all of my family, really.

“Because we don’t need it.” My mother, Jennifer Gourley, is much the same. While my father was away working she would take care of our dogs and run the house. She would fix the generator when it would break down. She took us to baseball and hockey and gymnastics. She took on foster kids that needed help. Gave them good meals and a family setting. She volunteered as a firefighter when there were forest fires threatening the areas. When Big Lake and Knik were being evacuated. She has since, in the most recent years become a fire fighter, an ambulance driver, a rescue technician, part of the dive rescue team, and Willows firefighter of the year. She is a part of her community.

“Because we don’t need it” was something that has been taught to me every day of my life through these amazing people and to watch Sarah Palin get so much attention based on what? 2 years as Governor of the State of Alaska? Or is it based on her time as the mayor of Wasilla? The town of 5,000 at the time.

“Because we don’t need it.”

We don’t need drilling in some of our most beautiful and untouched land. We need to work towards options. We should be investing and working towards clean fuels. We don’t need to be draining our planet of every last drop before moving on to the next. Sarah Palin disagrees

We needed votes to add the polar bear to the endangered species list. (I know, I know, that polar bear rug would really bring the room together!).  Sarah Palin disagreed

We don’t need aerial hunting… Again. We do NOT need this. I don’t know of any true Alaskan that feels it is good sport to shoot an animal from a plane. Sarah Palin disagrees

We don’t need book burners and censors. Sarah Palin pushed to get the librarian of Wasilla fired when certain books were not removed from the public library. Who else in history has banned books?  Not very good company is it?

We don’t need more debts. Palin spent 15 million on a new sports center in the valley, leaving the small town of Wasilla, Alaska in debt to the amount of 22 million. (That’s 22 million more than the debt she took on when taking on this lovely playtime as mayor.) 15 million just for a new sports center.

We don’t need family feuds interfering with duties. I know you feel your ex-brother-in-law was a dick… but trying to get him fired based on this may cause a little trouble. Sarah?

We don’t need another vote against gay marriage. This is just standard every day equal rights being overlooked. Sarah Palin disagrees.

We don’t need to overlook global warming. Science can now tell us “Yup. That is happening.” Not my words, that is science speak. Sarah Palin disagrees.

We don’t need a wolf in sheep’s clothing… or a sheep in wolves clothing, depending on how you look at it. She has billed her self as this overly average “hockey mom” and it is just not what I see. I see the sport hunter, the censor, choice taker, the revelations reader, and the high school cheerleader. It is endlessly embarrassing to watch people fall all over this idea. This is not my Alaska. The Alaska I know.

What we do need is love and respect for one another and respect for the world we live in.

We’ve spent a lot of time discussing the ins and outs of the Palin selection here at IOEOTO, but I thought it would be nice to share the perspective of someone who has first hand experience with Palin’s “executive experience”.

-Mike

5 Responses leave one →
  1. 2008 September 7
    soulintention permalink

    Thank you- we just do not need to go backwards any longer – thank you for speaking out 100% in agreement -

    bkm

  2. 2008 September 7

    This is really powerful in that it comes from a young person from the town of wasilla. See this hilarious blog on the subject of Russia being across the ocean from Alaska.

    http://alaskaisclosetorussia.wordpress.com

  3. 2008 September 7

    To start this, I would like to point out that I have lived in Alaska my entire life. I have never once blogged in my life. I have never thought of posting what I think as being of enough importance that someone else needs to read it, or cares to read it. But, as of late, with the elections and all, I feel like I have some things I need to get out. I read a blog today that was truly moving. The writer was eloquent, and made his point quite clear. He speaks with great visual imagery and told a story that I thought was truly great. After the story, he posted some things that are relatable to his story in that they would affect this “Alaskan lifestyle” in which he is accustomed to. These things, I have felt, didn’t quite add up for me, so I just wanted to address them, from my own point of view, meaning no disrespect for the original author. And these things may mean nothing, and I definitely don’t have the influential pull that the original writer possesses due to placement in the entertainment industry. So read with an open mind and take with a grain of salt. His posts will be shown in bold and will also be italicized.
    We don’t need drilling in some of our most beautiful and untouched land. We need to work towards options. We should be investing and working towards clean fuels. We don’t need to be draining our planet of every last drop before moving on to the next. Sarah Palin disagrees
    There are obviously issues that I agree and disagree with Sarah Palin on. This is one of the issues I am in the middle with. Sarah Palin is about production and drilling of ANWR, I am against it. But it isn’t like she is alone. Ballot measure 4 in Alaska was a huge controversy. Yes on measure 4 would mean stricter rules for mining waste and clean up, and due to some wording issues, it seemed that it would shut down the mines, which was a bit of an exaggeration. No on ballot measure 4 would obviously mean that current mining regulations in place are enough. Results from the primary elections -( keeping in mind voter turnout is obviously not 100%, probably not even 50%, but those who chose to voice their opinion counts, and the people who chose not to vote, chose to let someone else choose their future)-
    Ballot Measure 4 (Mining Initiative):
    - No: 95,615 votes, 57.14 percent
    - Yes: 71,722 votes, 42.86 percent1
    Palin showed considerable support for this campaign to turn down the ballot measure, but the votes still came out opposing the initiative. She showed support for what Alaskans wanted- the people she was in office to serve. This is not my Alaska. The Alaska I know. Things may have changed since you left. I am in no way questioning that ANWR is not open for a reason. Drilling is not an answer to our nation’s economy problem, but there needs to be something to happen to free our reliance on foreign oil until alternate energy solutions can be found. ..we lived in a house powered by generator alone. Average gas price on a gallon of fuel in 2003 1.512- average gas price today – $4.332, not to mention some people are in the rural areas are paying upwards of ten dollars a gallon to fuel their homes. You cannot say that people are making enough to pay two and half times the amount today as they did just 5 years ago. Not to mention how cheap gas was at the time of heating your rural area. Considering in 1998, it was as low as $1.063. I am in no way trying to take away the fact that you did have an experience of a log cabin and all, but 300 a year isn’t going to cut it anymore, adjusted for inflation that is 571 dollars today, which isn’t enough.
    We needed votes to add the polar bear to the endangered species list. (I know, I know, that polar bear rug would really bring the room together!). Sarah Palin disagreed
    On this issue, I need to refer to another issue brought up, which in some small ways contradict each other.
    We don’t need aerial hunting… Again. We do NOT need this. I don’t know of any true Alaskan that feels it is good sport to shoot an animal from a plane. Sarah Palin disagrees
    In this statement, I feel you are overlooking and interpreting facts to support your own conclusions (and sway the ideas of those who are uninformed on the issue of aerial wolf hunting without actually telling them what it is for or about). To clear up any misconceptions, you cannot just jump in a plane and go hunting, it requires governmental permission. The idea behind aerial wolf hunting is that there needs to be predator control. There are remote areas of Alaska where moose and caribou population become close to extinction, not endangered species, area specific populations being dangerously low. The aerial wolf hunting allows government agencies to aerially hunt these predators so people who do rely on these moose and caribou for food, those who need it, not to be confused with a statement (”Because we don’t need it.”), because some do, can have those animals available. (“I don’t know of any true Alaskan that feels it is good sport to shoot an animal from a plane. Sarah Palin disagrees “) Again I would like to make a motion towards Alaskan voters, this is referred to in our recent primary elections as ballot measure 2.
    Ballot Measure 2 (Predator Control):
    - No: 92,741 votes, 55.59 percent
    - Yes: 74,082 votes, 44.41 percent
    No means that aerial wolf hunting is to continue as it currently is, yes means it would make it more strict on regulations, the ballot measure basically asked “should aerial wolf hunting be more controlled?”Alaskans answered no, I again refer to – This is not my Alaska. The Alaska I know. It may be different now.
    My main point of the contradiction here is that you want to stop aerial wolf hunting, even though it saves populations of animals, and you jump on her about the polar bears issue. I would like to point out some information on one of the scientists who first realized that the polar bears are becoming desperate. And I quote-“Stroeve, whose research is quoted in the proposal several times, said she was happy to lend a hand, but had one issue: “How is listing them going to protect (them), if the ice is going to melt anyway? Stroeve said all the ice will most likely be gone in 10 to 20 years, especially if we keep having hot summers. Despite her predictions, she said the listing would help bring attention to climate change.” This is environmentalists using ice melting to stop the drilling issues. Climate change was the cause, which will act as my segway into the next bit of information.
    We don’t need to overlook global warming. Science can now tell us “Yup. That is happening.” Not my words, that is science speak. Sarah Palin disagrees.
    Yes, carbon dioxide in the air has increased in the last century due to the use of fossil fuels. Yes, global average temperature has increased 0.8 degrees F in the same century. Unfortunately, the temperature increase came first: most of the temperature increase was before 1940, and most of the new carbon dioxide was added after 1960. Would you trust a “scientist” who said the result came before the cause? I’m not trying to say your “science” isn’t correct, but there is more than one view of global warming in the scientific field. There is no room for dogma in science, there is no absolutism in science, and that is the only true fact you can pull from science. The fact that something is really only true until it has been proven wrong again. I realized this next example would be outdated, but at a time, scientists did believe the earth was flat and that the sun and other planet systems revolved around us. I am just saying it, “not my words, that is science speak.”
    In the aggregate, livestock has a greater impact on global warming than the entire transportation sector i.e. planes, trains, and automobiles. Which means that simply eating less meat can potentially reduce your carbon footprint more than driving a Prius.
    Again, I am not science your scientists are wrong, I just feel that they may be interpreting facts to support their own conclusions, just like the scientists who believe global warming is a hoax may be doing. You have to see my logic here. There are holes in the evidence on both sides of the argument, so jumping on the issue isn’t completely in the best interest do to because of “science speak.”
    We don’t need book burners and censors. Sarah Palin pushed to get the librarian of Wasilla fired when certain books were not removed from the public library. Who else in history has banned books? Not very good company is it?
    I am in complete agreeance with the author here. I believe censorship reflects a society’s lack of confidence in itself. Removing books from a library is wrong, but stating that she is a book burner, is just incorrect. This is, however, what brings me to another criticism of Sarah Palin, though overlooked in your posting, is something I would like to bring up, because in a way you have strengthened my argument on the issue. We don’t need censors, I completely agree on the issue. Sarah Palin is all about teaching creationism is schools alongside evolutionary theory. The government quite obviously has banned and censored this act in schools. Isn’t the idea that we are bashing Palin because she wanted some books removed a bit contradictory on the fact that the government can censor whatever they want and not get questioned. If people in my elementary school had a choice, not to stand up and recite the pledge of allegiance that is fine. It is their right as free citizens, just as it should be their right to hear both sides of an argument. At this point, I would like to quote Malcolm X, because even though he may not have believed that creationism in schools was important, he would have wanted to her both sides of the argument, and I quote,” the purpose of education is not to fill the mind, rather is in place to open it.” If we are to argue censorship and bash Palin about it, you might as well complain about the central government’s monopoly on the public education system and call the banners and censors as well.
    We don’t need another vote against gay marriage. This is just standard every day equal rights being overlooked. Sarah Palin disagrees.
    If we are going to bring this issue about, I might as well point out another person’s point of views as well. Because Barack Obama is opposed to gay marriage as well. While it is no question that he supports gay rights and civil unions, but you are being short sided, because there is not one candidate in this election that does support gay marriage. If we are going to get into it, John McCain voted against a same sex marriage ban, he felt that it should be left up to the states, just like Obama does. McCain is the one running for president here, Palin stance on the issue matters, but ultimately it is McCain who would make the decision, and he has obviously agreed with his democratic opponent on the issue. To come back to the original issue, you are right, Palin does oppose gay marriage, but she again is not the only one, she is just a target.(stance wise, bring up that sexist, “she is a target because she is a woman” and I will pull my hair out, she is under the microscope about everything is all I am pointing out.)

    At this point, I feel I have put to much time into this already, but I would like to say that these are issues and how I feel, if you disagree, that is fine.
    I decided to cite some sources for the enjoyment of it.

    1. http://alaskapride.blogspot.com/2008/08/alaska-2008-primary-election-results.html
    2. http://www.alaskagasprices.com/Prices_nationally.aspx
    3. http://www.roadsideamerica.com/exhibit/history.html
    4. http://ontheissues.org/

  4. 2008 September 7

    thats insider information for you, PTM’s post was incomplete ramblings of an uninformed, former alaskan.

  5. 2008 September 7

    I thought the piece was really well-written. Perhaps PTM’s point was that “we don’t need it” is a philosophy or way of living that people use when they live close to the margins. His father, living off $300 and the land in his younger days, knew not to waste. You never know if it will be there when you REALLY need it. I don’t buy the argument to drill in ANWAR, either. Needing something with such a long time-line for delivery means we need….something else right now. Tougher, negotiated, solutions are probably required.

    I’m from Minnesota and was taught this same idea from my dad when hunting.

    I thought the charge that Palin helped get a $15 million sports arena built and left the town with such a heavy debt is probably the most pertinent to the race for the Presidency.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS